I think photography is an agreement called a name that is recognized around the world in the era of the 1800s, as previously mentioned there is a Solargraphy. Do not be abbreviated or split into Photo-Art, or Contemporary-Photo, or Photo-Journalism, or the other. Forget the past, any mention of digital – instant and that other combinations. This name must still called just: Photography. Photography is a long history of learning process and the complex and highly dedicated. Because photography is also a formula that has become all the reference technology in the next era. There are ethics that must be understood until the end.
‘Digital’, people still do not really know, where the origin of this technology, so it is still resist comparing the ‘photo’s’. I am not a scientist who works on an advanced laboratory, but at least, I learned the formulas of light and magnetic, with a random. And actually, in the science of Photography (analog / digital) and its performance, it’s not a problem, because based on science and the same formula: Scan-Record Object projection or Moment -with a precise and straightforward.
The interesting thing is when people use the word “photo” in the piece word photography in the digital era. But it is also the same question: ‘Digital’ is a photography?’. Confusion which used it as a process and form are broken down or combined-merge into a separate conflict when digital technology is so rapid. Moreover, the ‘light-magnetic’ that can be added to other devices in the hope still called Photography. And reference is made worse when Photography and more abandoned.
Development of the era-Digital-Photography and Art becomes a conflict when people have forgotten or worse do not know the process of photography at the beginning and the principle amount that is: ‘to record the moment’ as it were. For those who already understand it would be more concentrated and continue to find where lies naturally ‘Art’ is true in photography. It is like a ‘bonus’ that come into its own. Do not try to seek or create excessive.
“An optical performance of a normal eye, it will not convey a false information to our brain-a natural principle, Photography Even so, and that the principle of Photography. That’s a strict ethics in the process of work in photography.”
And back again, no addition or subtraction. Photography is not a subjective judgment / opinion. Photography, an object of direct experience in the recording, and it needs to be ‘flying hours’ enough. Art, like the blessings will flow by itself. It all can only be owned by people who have high dedication in completing the whole process of photography.
“Sense to understanding of work processes and results of of Photography, should be returned, the original synchronization. Thus, when people speak of a photography, it’s not just on the results of (visual) that looked / printed only. Not the Aesthetic or artistic orientation of the complex. Nor is art that can be attributed to a subjective discourse-if not directly concerned in it.”