Read: Fine Art, is ‘Pure Art‘, that comes from: Photography (it self), or Art’s (that discussed in) is ‘a: subjects’ that appears from within the photography itself. And according to the order of mention of the language, I would affirm the use of the word: ‘Photography’ first, and then the word of ‘Art’ -will following. And I would write: ‘Fine Art of Photography‘ (Photographic Art), first -full, without having to cut it down to: ‘Photo Art‘, because at some definitions, will be different, between of ‘Photography’ and the ‘photo’ itself,-even if used for understanding each represents. The writing becomes: Photo Art, will be the second in its use, -to understanding of that goes beyond the definition of photography itself. Fine Art (of) Photography, an achievement ‘Pure Reality’ in an objective. In fact, the objective’s in photography from its beginning, only be understood in the objectivity of the technical process of projection only.



The use of the word ‘Photo’, basically more synonymous with: photography results (photograph), whereas Photography, is the science and study as a whole. Photography is a technical scientific projection optics are very strict. Since from the beginning and the basis of the discovery of Photography, not even recognized with what is called: ‘Art’. Especially when it comes to what is defined as the Fine Arts (painting). It happened after and later, when we master the basic photography first, and do not try to look for the shortcut, because the fragment system in photography will be a lot missing and blurred.

Photography, identical to the technology related to optical and energy-something that is real and ‘object-ivities’ (in conception: visible light). However, in the process of development and visual outcomes, photography has a remarkable influence, the results include existence. When on this level, which is discussed later on subjectivity appreciation in many directions and communication (Vision). Photography is a visual technical achievement (the objective) and subsequent projections will include the subjectively’s visual itself. In mathematical-physics, photographic projections will reach to a point of discussion about the ‘energy’ of ‘invible light’. Formula continuous back and forth, from the visible to the invisible light to light (electromagnetic). Expression or Appreciation, is the energy of the invisible light itself.

If the Photography is Photography, more scientific definition would be more easier to understand. Even the ‘adding’ the word of ‘Art’ or ‘Fine Art’ is also not too much talk about, because there will already contain ‘concerns’ – other else. Photography is a visual representation of the energy and optical formula, and it is rarely discussed: Verbal energy (theory of: Vision). Verbal is projected vision energy in the calculation of ‘black light’ (invisibe light), and Visual are projections of optical energy from the ‘white light’ (visible light). (see: the written)

When talking ‘art’ in the definition of ‘fine-art’ in photography, maybe a million appreciation could be raised, subjectively, and will never be finished. However, when examined within the fine-art photography is ‘purity-basically’, which arises from within (content), and the basis of the results of objective photography, will be more easy to understanding. Even art that emerged from within photography, it’s not tricky. Art in photography is very scalable and can be defined. No one needs to be ‘hidden’, but the uniqueness of the content in photography into a ‘puzzle’ to be raised and reviewed further. Appreciation and expression into the second, third, and so on, even being not important at the beginning of the photographic process. Appreciation and Expression, which are subjective, does not appear from the outside of the content and the results photography itself, because photography is the study and the results are realistic within strict technical.

Stranger Unpredictable

Stranger Unpredictable

“What is seen and what is to be produced”-in the process of photography, this is really the key definition of it. In fact, we can make up a lot of definition of without having to ‘borrow’ others definition of the word art (which already exists first). Likewise later, photography will have more and more its own definition of art. Photography talk about the reality of what happened, and then projected naturally, to be able to pull out the objectivity of its own, even more powerful than reality itself, this is what will affecting our vision. It could even happen, the strong reality of photography, to be more powerful than reality itself, seemed to be something that can not be explained and interpreted,-these are ambiguous and erroneous. Photography is in reality container, not the container of imagination.

More obvious longer, is ‘fine art’ in photography, and should not be defined as a Fine Arts (Painting), however, more precise understanding to: Pure Arts (Originality of that appears from: Photographic) -just its, which means talking about purity and the originality of the scholarship’s photography itself. However, until now, uses of ‘fine art photography’ in review ‘impact’ of art (painting) is still used. Probably still available, but it should be understood that the definition is not the same when ‘Photographic Art’, translated in scientific definitions of Fine Arts (Painting). Fine Art in photography, the basic achievement of purity will technical mastery, and then define and communicate in detail, about what is in the content of the photographic results.

Pure Reality (Photography), is a visual projection optics, is the definition of a ‘way of seeing’, while the next projection is located on understanding the ‘way of looking’ is defined as Alternative Reality. And ‘complicity’ of expression, appreciation, and interpretation, is the impact of projected Pure Reality. Both of these ongoing factors, is a series of projections normal and reasonable. The task of a photographic artist (photographer) must be able to create a ‘fortress’ own definition, how to make their work remains in the area of pure photography, which is not out of the path science, not adding another element besides the factors of light, exaggerating technically, and makes manipulation , the factors and basic science aspects beyond the projection of the photography.

At one point the conversation is rarely displayed openly: Statement or submission of purposes, from a photographer / artist on his own photography. They rarely put forward ideas, intent, and purpose on their own photographic work. Simple things that should be done is to write them down, through the title, big contents, or description. This can cause ‘depression expressively‘ / ‘depression of appreciative‘ to themselves or others, so that could be mistaken interpretation. Submission of statement can also use the included media: Voice / Sound.

As I wrote before, the reality in photography, it is very complex. The reality is strongly related to the energy projection of light (photons), which includes 3 major elements of, ie: eyes> <brain> <recording device, which continuously related. And with photography, all of it is very easy to define if we took the time to deepen with more details. And when all that was to be defined in more detail, so I’ve been able to mention the ‘Fine Art of Photography’ is its Pure Art of Photography itself, and inscribed with: ‘Photographic Art‘ or ‘Photo Art‘. When it comes to any mention of the ‘Photo Art’ is, I am not just talking about the ‘results’ are printed or displayed alone, but the overall impact and considered scientifically, both in Interpretation, Appreciation, and Expression in it.


“Concept” vs “Statement”

From the beginning, when steeped in of photography, I almost never use the term: ‘concept‘, as show ‘idealism’ in the course of my photographic work experience. Concept, I use, just in a significant percentage of the very few in photography, ie: for the state of commercial, communication design or a particular order. Concept, in my previous article is ‘black light’, being scientific of photography, was material ‘white light’ –photons. Let’s further deepened understanding of basic (consensus) etymology and ontology. Within the assessments of photography, I am more ‘advantaged’ comprehension, when the term ‘Statement‘, to refine the definition, content, and basic scientific of photography further. Statement, further strengthen the factual value of the object, in a of photography results, arising from the content of the image, and are more ‘real’ represents the value of objectivity.

Management Conflict

Concept, more ‘virtual’, because its appearance can be very subjective or influenced by other purposes. Within the ‘truth’ of photography studies, or the most basic of photography (fine-art of photography), the concept never showed up and used. Photography in principle, barely know with what called: Concept. However, sometimes, ‘culture’ to use of words and terms: ‘concept’ is considered to be a ‘how to’ legitimate and common, to explain the content and definition of photography. I attempt to change the experience to understand both the topic. I prefer to use the terms ‘statement’ in photography. Statement, is a logical expression, because photography is a very technical scientific and mathematically rigorous.

i'm mistist

Explicitness a statement, more positive moving forward and more bluntly. Whereas concept, more structured to the ‘metaphysical’ is philosophical. In a further understanding of the statement, its definitive is closer to the notion of ‘proportion’ logical of photography, while the concept is more likely to close to the connotative meaning ‘composition’ / composite. Photography, in the basic understanding and furthermore too, do not know the terms of composition, but rather the proportion of technical mastery and purpose, to obtain the maximum results. The two terms are quite confusing and difficult to assessments of photography further, but if not defined in detail, will make the future confusion that will never be finished for the always contentious. Composition, not ‘belong’ of photography from the beginning, and the concept, is abstraction metaphysical subjectivity from the outside scientific study of of photography.

i'm oldist

Comprehension and understanding of the Statement, which means: presentation-declaration-announcement-explanation-clarification-publications, and so on, is ‘an expression structure’ that is conveyed and expressed, and is considered the most unbiased information logically. The structure of the information provided verbally or in writing is the formulation of ‘proportion expressive declarative’-a more positive and real. The Expression structure, shown in a related and straightforwardly (objective), from the visual of photography itself, not from the outside. Easy, that statement is identical to the meaning of: ‘what do see is what do you get’. And it’s located right in front of the your eyes and lens is, in the view finder camera, from the results: ‘projection formula cross’ on the recording equipment, on the result of a of photography image obtained. Defining the statement further, obtained in the process of ‘developing’ the image itself, either through a dark room or editing via computer-ultimately to be understood as meaning: ‘painting with light’.